Proline Sports Handicapping: Bears vs. Giants Sunday Night Football

This week’s football schedule includes a contest between the Chicago Bears and the New York Giants on NBC.

OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the football betting match-up using key numbers employed by professional gamblers.

In comparing yards per rush on offense, the better numbers belong to the Giants by 1.1, a large upper hand.

As far as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the upper hand is for Chicago by 2.6,

According to yards per point, the more efficient offense is Chicago by 4.1.

Defensively the more stingy team based on yards per rush is the Bears by a whopping 1.7 dichotomy.

The superior defense in terms of passing yards per completion is the G-Men by 2.0

The yards per point statistic used by the best sports handicappers says the superior defense is Chicago which forces teams to waste 8.0 more.

Who to bet on according to the football betting experts against the spread It’s from the famed LateInfo line with big Sunday morning info. The NBC Sunday night football keeps domination alive with the side from Big Red on the Bears on the NY Giants.

October is just like September: sweep the month. Oct. 2 finally there was a sweat as UNLV keeps perfection. Sept. 26 the Chiefs routing the 49ers right after Sept. 25 it was another gift on Stanford, Sept. 19 it was the Dolphins over Vikings. Sept. 18 Nebraska routs Washington, Sept 11 it was Alabama humiliating Penn State, and Sept 4 it was Oregon State covering versus TCU. The LateInfo has not missed. “Big Red” is a major figure and pioneer in offshore betting. He has unique access to professional oddsmakers and gamblers. All his bets are based on consulting with elite handicappers, pro bettors and linesmakers.

Big Red now has the Bears vs. Giants on NBC Sports. Click now to purchase

Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.

Leave a Reply